Thursday, March 28, 2024
Norwegian concepts

Who was the “husmann”?

 

The title “husmann” appear in all the sources we use inĀ  Norwegian genealogy.

The title “husmann” is normally translated into English as cotter or crofter. Looking at definitions of this term found online, I see that the Norwegian cotter’s conditions were a little different from those in other countries.

The featured photo shows a cotter’s place probably situated in Sunndal, MĆøre og Romsdal. The persons are not known. Photo by Ole J Gravem d.e. Stiftelsen NordmĆøre Museum License: CC ShareAlike

As I have used the term “cotter” and the term “cotter’s place – Husmannsplass” in many of my writings, I should perhaps have written this article first.

We may find this term in several sources as husmann, huusmand, pladsemand. This is the man in the family. The wife is normally described as huusmandskone or pladsemandskone. When it is talk about the couple we may find the term pladsefolk/plassefolk. Husmand is sometimes abbreviated toĀ Hmd.

The term strandsitterĀ may be used about cotters living by water.

There has been written several books about the conditions of the husmann so within the scope of this article I have to cover this topic in very general terms.

In short: The “social class” cotter (“Husmann”) was a person who lived on a piece of land thatĀ  did not appear as a separate entity in the land register. The owner had to pay the taxes on this land. The cotters rented this land and paid either in money or by working at the farm. Some cotters had land where they could do a little farming and keep a few animals (often a cow for milk). Other cotters had no land and had to rely on some kind of handcrafts to support their family. Cotters are often looked upon as very poor people. Some definitely were, but it is not possible to generalise, because the conditions from one cotter family to the next did vary a lot. There were also big differences from district to district. Cotters who performed some kind of handcrafts e.g. coblers, tailors etc. were able to earn a decent living.

The term HusmannĀ was used as far back as in the late 1200’s. At this time andĀ through theĀ nextĀ centuries it referred to aĀ lodger or aĀ personĀ who had no permanent employment andĀ took odd jobs.Ā Husmann could also be used about aĀ man who had retired and was now supported by younger people, often his son or daugther’s family.Ā Finally, husmann could be used about a person who cleared a piece of land and settled there (PrestesƦter: 12-13).

These explanations though, are not relevant for the husmann we meet in the Norwegian sources from about 1700 and onward.

To understand the term cotter we need to look at the population growth that started in the early 1700’s

GoingĀ back to the middle of the 1300’s and the Black plague, we learn thatĀ in this epidemic 50 to 60 % of the population in Norway died (Wikipedia: Svartedauden). It took about 400 years for the population to grow to the number it was before the Black plague struck Norway (Wikipedia: Norges demografi).

There were different ways to meet the needs of the increasing number of households. The farms that were left abandoned during the black plague were inhabitated. There was an extensive cultivating of land that had not earlier been farmed.Ā Some of the new households was provided for by splitting the old farms into smaller farm parts. There is, however, a limit to how small a farm can be and still provide for a household.Ā  The most extensive splitting of farms took place in areas where one could get additional income. This was the situation on the coast where the fisheries provided income.Ā Also in areas adjacent to mines or rich forestries there was an extensive farm splitting (Jones: 38).

Cotters were divided into two cathegories

  • Husmann med jord,Ā i.e. the cotter had land where he could raise a crop and keep animals.
  • Husmann uten jordĀ i.e. the cotter had no land and were dependent of an income from paid work or a handcraft.

The farms reasons for letting someone live as cotters on their land

  • Help out a son/brother to get an income.Ā The oldest son inherited the farm, but another son could get a livelyhood by living as a cotter at the farm.
  • Extra income from rent
    • Monetary. This husmann’s paid money to rent for the land and his conditions were similar to the renter (leilending). He is sometimes called a Bygslingshusmann. If the cotter worked on the landlords farm, he would be paid for this work. This kind of agreements were often found in areas where the cotter had the possibility to earn some money on the side e.g. from or fishing, mining or forestry. Also a cotter who performed a handcraft e.g. tailoring, shoemaking etc. could pay rent for his cotter’s place.
    • Rent paid in natural goods.Ā This is similar to the conditions of the sharecropper.
  • Have the needed seasonal help at handĀ not having to pay for year-round employed farm hands. Many cotter’s agreements stated that the cotter were to work a defined number of days at certain times of the year. Sometimes the cotter’s children were required to shepherd the landlords animals while they grazed in the forests/mountains.
  • Have more of the land cleared and farmed (rydningshusmann).Ā Some husmenn rented a piece of land that had not previously been cleared. Their first task would be to clear the land and build houses. MostĀ of the agreements stated that the land would go back to the farm when the cotter died. This would slowly increase the cultivated land of the farm. There were also landlords who accepted that the lease of the cotter’s place where handed down to the oldest son of the cotter.
By Benjamin Wegner/Ole Knudsen (Cotter’s agreementĀ for Frognerseteren 1837) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
The Cotter’s contract

Prior to 1750 the cotters had very little protection in the laws. In 1750 regulations were put in place. These stated that the agreement had to be written. Also the regulations stated that as long as the cotter fulfilled the terms, the contract was valid in the cotter’s lifetime.

These regulations were amended several times (Lokalhistoriewiki).

The cotters agreements differed a lot. Here are some of the most common terms that was defined in these contract.

  • A description of the land (Cotter’s place) with boundaries.
  • A statement about the cotter’s duty to maintain the houses on the cotter’s place.
  • Which and how much of the farms resources the cotter were allowed to use, e.g. wood for building materials and firewood.
  • Grazing of the cotter’s animals on the farm’s outfield.
  • How the rent is paid. In work on the farm, in natural goods or in money (or a combination).

Hopefully this little presentation has helped you get an understanding of the “Husmann’s” condition. Like I have pointed out, their lives varied and it is hard to tell exactly how the life of your ancestor was.

A farm name with the suffix eie/eje/eye usually means that this was a cotter’s dwelling at the farm that’s named.

I may come back in a later article and look at the husmenn in particular districts.

 

Sources:

Jones, MichaelĀ Kulturlandskapets utvikling i Norge : mellomfagskompendium i historisk geografiĀ Trondheim : Geografisk institutt, Universitetet i Trondheim, 1999

PrestesƦter, PĆ„l Husmannskontrakter og lovregulering : regulering av avtaleforholdet mellom husmann og gĆ„rdbruker 1687 til 1851 – sƦrlig sett i lys av kontraktspraksis fra Toten. Institutt for offentlig rett, Universitetet i Oslo, 1998

Articles from Wikipedia:

Svartedauden https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svartedauden

Norges demografi https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norges_demografi

LokalhistoriewikiĀ Husmannslovgivningen

7 thoughts on “Who was the “husmann”?

  • Fascinating to compare with the English husbandman, and the Northern English and Southern Scottish cottar. See Robert Burns’ poem, ‘The cottar’s Saturday night’. Farmers, even tenant farmers, usually had more social status.

    Reply
  • This was a very useful article. Thank you. I am researching my ancestors and families in Aadalen and around Norderhov, so was very pleased to have information about the husmenn.
    I have also appreciated your articles on handwriting in the church books, as they are sometimes very hard to decipher!
    A very good resource for English researchers. Many thanks for making these articles available
    Helen

    Reply
    • Hello Helen
      Thanks for visiting and for the kind words. This blog is a labor of love and I learn a lot from writing it.

      Reply
  • Fascinating information. My great great-grandfather was a Husmann on the Oppem Farm in Nord Trondelag County (N/E of Trondheim). All four of his sons (the eldest was my great-grandfather) were tailors/cobblers in Norway and then came to Amerika in 1885 and worked as tailors. Family records just say that the brothers received training as tailors in Norway. I suppose that’s as specific of information I’ll find. But are there any sources that explain how a Norwegian who was the son of a Husmann could receive his tailor training? They apparently made enough money to travel 2nd Class accommodations to Amerika. I can only assume they were able to rise up to the Norwegian Middle Class?

    Reply
  • Hello Matthew

    It was quite common that sons of husmenn learned a trade. They started as apprentices for a master and worked their way up. My G-Grandfather went to the nearest town and was trained as a cobbler. His forefathers was tailors as far back as I know (1780) They were all husmenn.

    Reply
  • Martin, your article is helpful especially, it seems to me, for those of us living in the USA or Canada because the conditions in Norway when the great numbers were leaving were so different than those over here (in the late 1800s to early 1900s). It may be difficult for today’s Norwegians and those of us who are descendants of those who emigrated to really grasp Amerika feber because Norway today is so different (economically) that when the large emigrations were taking place. Since so many of those who left Norway found themselves locked in as husmenn uten jord or their family members, they were basically destined to be peasants throughout their lives,
    Once it became known in Norway that there was land and/or jobs available in Amerika my grandparents on both my mother and father’s sides pulled up stakes and headed for Minnesota and in my mother’s case, her parents wound up in Saskatchewan, Canada after bouncing around a bit in Minnesota, South Dakota, and Colorado. They knew that by remaining in Norway they would be locked into their peasant status. The possibility of being able to have their own piece of land far away across the ocean was stronger than their desire to remain in their homeland and struggle day to day with little hope of ever breaking out of the entrenched economical conditions in Norway. If my grandparents were still alive today they would be absolutely stunned to learn of how economic conditions have so drastically changed for the better. When my farmor would read letters from “back home,” she would cry because she lengte hjem and realized that there was no possibility for her to ever see her siblings and parents again. We should never forget the sacrifices these Norwegians made to leave their homeland in search of improving their lives.

    Reply

Tell me what you think about this article!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. Cookies are only used for traffic measuring. No single user can be identified from these cookies.

Close